1. The Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff the second floor housing (one household) 53.96 square meters of the building indicated in the attached Form.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. According to the reasoning of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including the provisional number)’s reasoning and the entire pleadings, the plaintiff’s conclusion of the lease agreement with the owner of real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”); ② on February 16, 2014 between the plaintiff’s spouse C and the defendant, the part of the second floor house (one household) 53.96 square meters (hereinafter “the leased object of this case”) among the instant real estate on February 16, 2014 with respect to the lease period from February 16, 2014 to February 15, 2015; and ④ the payment of the deposit and delivery of the leased object of this case’s lease agreement at around 300,000,000 won (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”); and ③ the Defendant was not obligated to return the leased object of this case’s lease agreement at around 200,000,000 won due to the expiration of the lease agreement as is.

Therefore, the defendant is deemed to possess the leased object of this case without permission. Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to deliver the leased object of this case to the plaintiff who claims for the exclusion of disturbance based on ownership.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.