logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2015.01.13 2014노278
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수강도강간등)등
Text

Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal - The sentence of unfair sentencing (ten years of imprisonment, 10 years of disclosure and notification, 10 years of attachment order to an electronic tracking device, 10 years of attachment order to an electronic tracking device, and forfeiture) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the part of the Defendant’s case, the circumstance that the Defendant and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) made a confession of all of the crimes in this case and recognized their mistake, the Defendant appears to require additional inspection and regular medical treatment due to his or her detailed identification sponson’s certificate, and the Defendant’s birth wanting to take the Defendant’s wife against the Defendant is considered as a favorable condition for the Defendant.

However, on the other hand, each of the crimes of this case committed each of the crimes of this case, with a deadly weapon knife the victim's resistance, by taking a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, and rape the victim.

arrow