logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 광주시법원 2018.02.22 2017가단76
승계집행문부여이의의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s case concerning the purchase price of goods at the Sung-nam District Court, Sung-nam Branch of the Sung-nam Branch of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 2014 tea2321.

Reasons

1. After an order for payment stated in Paragraph 1 of the order for indication of the claim was finalized, the succeeding execution clause was granted to the plaintiffs, as the deceased deceased D, the deceased deceased.

However, on August 19, 2015, after the death of the above D, the Plaintiffs were judged to have succeeded to the inheritance at the Sung-nam Branch of Suwon District Court.

Therefore, the plaintiffs should not be subject to compulsory execution on the part exceeding the scope of inherited property from the above D.

2. Judgment on deemed confession based on recognition (Articles 208 (3) 3 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow