A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2018, at around 22:40, the Defendant reported 112 as the fact that he was an employee at the above restaurant in front of the public restaurant “C” located in the public restaurant “C” in the public restaurant B, and the Defendant was urged to return home from E in the situation where he was dispatched after receiving a report at around 22:50 on the same day.

Defendant E has no answer to the foregoing E. B.

Republic of Korea Doz. Doz. Doz.

As such, the Defendant’s mother seems to have expressed a desire not to separate, but to see that it would be threatening, and whether the Defendant’s mother is able to see: (a) the Defendant’s mother is a large number of us; and (b) n’s name is changed.

I will not meet the requirements of this section.

“Along with a sound, the gambling of the gambling E was assaulted by the gambling of the gambling E on the floor and continuously gambling the gambling E on two occasions.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of crimes reported.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Investigation report (or relative investigation by a bathing witness G);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting a black stuff image with a face of interference with the performance of official duties;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. An order to attend a lecture or an order to attend a community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is deemed to have expressed a desire to a police officer who is performing official duties on the grounds of sentencing, frighting, frighting, voiceing, and assaulted, and thus, the nature of the crime is very bad. Recognizing o’s mistake and reflect. A police officer victimized does not want the punishment of a defendant. A police officer does not have any particular criminal record other than a fine imposed once due to the crime of injury. Taking account of the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant’s insult, on February 20, 2018, at the “I convenience store” located in the Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, without any reason.