(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.09.06 2016가단3018

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.09.06 2016가단3018

레미콘대금

Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff KRW 46,973,520, and Defendant B Co., Ltd. from May 11, 2016.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) On October 21, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of ready-mixed with Defendant B, and Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation to pay ready-mixed price to the Plaintiff of Defendant B. (2) The Plaintiff supplied ready-mixed worth KRW 46,973,520 to Defendant B during the period from October 29, 2015 to March 28, 2016, and Defendant B did not pay the above ready-mixed price up to now.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant B: The fact that there is no dispute between Defendant C and Defendant C, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from May 11, 2016 to the day of delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case as asserted by the Plaintiff, and Defendant C is jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff delay damages calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from May 12, 2016 to the day of full payment.

2. Defendant C, on September 8, 2015, entered into a contract with Defendant C Co., Ltd. on the construction cost of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the building site of the

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is accepted as a ground for conclusion.

참조조문

-소송촉진 등에 관한 특례법

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2019.10.16 2019나47315

-울산지방법원 2019.09.18 2018가단21554

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.01.16 2017가단805

-의정부지방법원 2016.07.15 2016가단400

-대구지방법원서부지원 2017.06.14 2016가단18412