1. The defendants are the Incheon District Court's reinforcement registry office on March 13, 1998 with respect to the real estate stated in the attached Table 1 list to the plaintiff.

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in attached Form 2;

(However, the Defendants succeeded to D upon the death of the network D. Meanwhile, there is no evidence to prove that the secured debt of this case was repaid on April 15, 1998, and the Plaintiff asserted as a selective cause of claim for the implementation of the cancellation registration procedure based on the completion of the statute of limitations. According to the evidence No. 1, the payment date of promissory notes, which is the secured debt of this case, was recognized as June 15, 1997, and it is apparent that the three-year statute of limitations has lapsed from that date, and thus, it is apparent that the three-year statute of limitations has lapsed on June 15, 200).2. The applicable provisions of this Act apply mutatis mutandis.

(a) Defendant B: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) (a) of the Civil Procedure Act

(b) Defendant C: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Decision by public notice)