The decision of the Daegu District Court 2012 Gaz. 15869 between the net E and FF corporation is about the loan case.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 1, the non-party F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "non-party FF bank") filed a loan claim lawsuit against the deceased E (hereinafter "the deceased") with the Daegu District Court 2012 Ghana Branch 15869, and the above court on April 4, 2013, "the deceased jointly and severally with G 7,020,446 won and 3.5 million won among them were to be paid to the non-party F Bank at a rate of 22% per annum from March 21, 201 to the day of full payment, and the above judgment became final and conclusive at that time, the non-party FF bank demanded the plaintiff to pay the deceased's debts to the non-party F Bank on May 12, 2020, and it was found that the Defendants transferred the deceased's debts to the plaintiff on May 27, 2013.

Therefore, as to the decision on the loans case between the deceased and the non-party F Bank 2012 Ghana 15869, the Daegu District Court racing support officer, etc. was obligated to grant the execution clause to the plaintiff, who is the successor of the non-party F Bank, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased, for compulsory execution against the defendants within the scope of the property inherited by the deceased.

I would like to say.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition (as to the costs of lawsuit, it shall be determined that the Defendants are liable to each party in consideration of the fact that the Defendants inherited the judgment.