logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.10.24 2018고단548
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on October 20, 2016, was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud in the Cheongju District Court’s Cheongju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s order on October 20, 2016, with the completion of the enforcement of a detention house on May 27, 2017, and with the same history of seven times more.

[2] On May 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D, a victim D, who was in the Won-si, in the Won-si, around 04:3, 2018; and (b) at the same time, the Defendant, despite the fact that he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the price despite the issuance of an order to pay the price; (c) by deceiving the victim by the method of placing an order; and (d) by deceiving the victim, he/she did not pay the price, even though he/she was provided with alcohol and alcohol equivalent to KRW 47,500, total market

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

"2018 Highest 760"

1. On May 16, 2018, the Defendant had the same attitude as paying the amount, even if he did not intend or have the ability to pay the amount, in the “HL” operated by the Victim G in the Won-si F, and even if he had the intent or ability to pay the amount, the Defendant deceivings the victim by the method of ordering, and had the victim receive the alcohol and alcohol equivalent to the total market value of KRW 80,000,000, including 10 sick and 1 Salkju, etc., from the victim, but did not pay the amount.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On May 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim J to board the K cab at the victim J’s seat in front of the original city, and (b) as if the Defendant would normally pay the taxi fee.

However, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the charge to the victim even if the victim is driving the said taxi and going to a nearby restaurant because there is no means to pay the charge in cash, etc.

The defendant.

arrow