beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties concerned, at the D Hospital verteba (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant Medical Corporation B (hereinafter “Defendant Medical Corporation”), the Plaintiff received the following: (a) 1: (b) 1: (c) 1: (a) 1: (a) 1: (a) 1: (a) 1; (b) 2; (c) 3: (a) 4-5; (d) 4-5; (b) 4-5; (b) 3; (c) 4-5; (c) 4-5; (d) 4-5; (e) 2; and (e) 2; and (e) 2; and (e) 3: (a) 2
B. On August 14, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on the 6-7 light signboard escape certificate accompanied by the scopic disease certificate at E Hospital. On the 14th day of the same month, the Plaintiff removed conical signboards No. 6-7 using the PC cases inserted under the Electric Access Act, reduced the number of cases, and then inserted and fixed by inserting rinks (block) (hereinafter “operation at around 2006”).
(2) On February 28, 2007, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from E Hospital after the surgery. On February 28, 2007, the Plaintiff received a medical examination of physical disability of Grade 2, 2, 2007, on the ground that “The Plaintiff received a medical examination of physical disability of Grade 2, 2, 2, 2007, on both sides, from the part of the Defendant Hospital, e.g., e., the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of the terminal part of which the Plaintiff was unable to take care of the doctor working at the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff appeared to have been unable to receive a medical examination again from the physician at the Defendant Hospital on November 26, 2008.
3. Even after the above medical examination and treatment, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the Defendant C from March 24, 2009 and received medical treatment from the Defendant C, and as a result, did not interfere with and take medicine.