beta
Text
1. The defendant shall, among the real estate stated in the attached Form, indicate the attached Form Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 in sequence.
Reasons
1. The following facts can be acknowledged in light of the following facts: there is no dispute between the parties; or the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 11 and the arguments.
The Plaintiff is a cooperative established on July 24, 2009 by obtaining authorization for the establishment on July 24, 2009 for a housing redevelopment project in a zone A (hereinafter “instant redevelopment project”) under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) using the land size of 16,142.6 square meters in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City C as the business area. The Defendant possessed the buildings and their sites indicated in the attached Form in the rearrangement zone of the instant redevelopment project and indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 75.68 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
B. On February 9, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) obtained the authorization to implement the instant redevelopment project from the Bupyeong-gu mayor; (b) obtained the authorization to implement the relevant redevelopment project on December 30, 2015; and (c) publicly announced the authorization to implement the relevant redevelopment project on December 30, 2015; and (d) on December 30, 2015
C. On August 29, 2016, the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal decided to expropriate KRW 116,731,60 for the buildings and their obstacles listed in the separate sheet, and KRW 264,957,00 for the site as compensation. D.
The Defendant received total sum of KRW 381,688,600 from the Plaintiff on September 22, 2016, and the Plaintiff completed each registration of transfer of ownership on the building and its site stated in the separate sheet as follows: (a) on October 13, 2016, Incheon District Court’s Additional Branch Branch registration and (b) No. 110255 on October 19, 2016.
2. According to the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant, the owner, pursuant to the main sentence of Article 49(6) of the Urban Improvement Act, is the Plaintiff, by approving and publicly announcing the management and disposal plan of the instant redevelopment project applied by the Plaintiff on December 30, 2015.