The judgment of the first instance, including the claim that was reduced by this Court, shall be modified as follows:

In the lawsuit of this case.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part pertaining to 4. conclusion) except for the modification of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following 2. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance

2. The amended portion of the fourth five pages “I” (hereinafter referred to as “I”) shall be amended to “(the trade name previously changed was L, but the trade name was changed as of March 5, 2010).”

4 The entire real estate in this case (hereinafter referred to as the "real estate in this case") shall be added after the "five floors" of the 4th parallel.

4 The sale contract of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "sale contract of this case") shall be added after the "sale contract of this case".

4 Under the 4th below, the "Therefore" shall be deleted.

4 Under the 4th page, "I" shall add " March 13, 2015" to the following:

5. The following shall be amended from 7th parallels to 8th parallels:

“.. Preliminary Claim (Claims for Damages Based on Unlawful Act) Defendant B is obligated to pay a sales agency fee to the Plaintiff who acquired the claim for sales agency fee.

In addition, the sales agency fee is an essential project cost corresponding to the first order among the funds execution order under Article 18(1) of the project agreement of this case, and it is a cost that should be paid in the order of priority from the proceeds of sales of the building of this case. Since the project agreement of this case is a contract for the third party, the plaintiff, the transferee of the bonds of sales agency fee, has the right to directly claim payment against the defendant C

Nevertheless, Defendant C unfairly rejected payment in violation of the order of funding execution under the instant business agreement even upon receiving a claim for the sales agency fee from Defendant B. This constitutes an act in violation of duties under the instant business agreement and constitutes a tort in relation to the Plaintiff, and thus, the Plaintiff is also obligated to pay the amount equivalent to the sales agency fee as compensation for tort.