logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.03 2014나2001506
예치금반환
Text

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and all the plaintiff's claims corresponding to the revocation part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the lower court’s reasoning is the same as that of the relevant part of the first instance judgment (2nd 14 to 10 pages 5), except that the reasoning for this part of the lower judgment is written as follows. As such, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

"The instant district unit planning zone" shall be added to the back part of "35,718 square meters" in the 13th place of the judgment of the first instance (hereinafter referred to as "instant district unit planning zone").

The joint agreement of March 8, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "joint agreement of March 8, 2005") shall be added to the back part of the "joint agreement of March 9 of the first instance judgment."

The fourth 21st 21st son of the judgment of the first instance is moving to “Defendant”.

"The conditions for authorization for project implementation added to the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as "the conditions for authorization for project implementation of this case") shall be added to the latter part of the 5th judgment of the first instance."

The 5th judgment of the court of first instance was approved, and the 21th judgment was added to “(hereinafter “the terms and conditions of the management and disposal plan added to the Plaintiff”)”.

The 6th century of the first instance judgment "2010Guhap6015" shall be deemed to be "207Guhap10397".

The August 12th of the first instance judgment "34,72,720 won" shall be deemed as "34,767,870 won", and "369,547,030 won" shall be deemed as "369,308,560 won".

The back of the 8th judgment of the court of first instance “2,317,592,740 won” of the 14th judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter “instant settlement”).

In addition, “A Study” is added. The 8th 20th 20 written “Attachment 2 and 3” in the judgment of the court of first instance is added to “Attachment 2.” The Plaintiff, Fladon Housing Association, and Fladon Housing Association” in the 9th 6th 6th 19th 20 judgment of the court of first instance shall read “the Plaintiff, Fladon Housing Association” as “the Plaintiff,” and Fladon Housing Association. The 9th 9th 9th 9th judgment of the court of first instance shall read “the terms and conditions of authorization for the instant project implementation” as “the conditions of authorization for the project implementation” in the judgment of first instance, both “attached 1” and “attached 2” in the judgment of first instance shall both be read as “attached 1 of

arrow