1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the real estate listed in No. 1 of the annexed list of real estate;

B. Defendant C shall provide attached real estate.

1. Claim against Defendant B, C, D, E, and I

(a)as shown in the corresponding part of the claim in the attachment of the claim;

(b) Defendant B of applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act ( judgment by public notice), Defendant C, D, E, and I: Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by public notice);

2. In light of the overall purport of the arguments in each of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers) against Defendant F, H, and J, the defendants are obligated to deliver to the plaintiff who acquired the right to use and benefit from each of the real estate of this case as the project implementer pursuant to Article 81(1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

(2) According to the reasoning of the lower court’s judgment, the lower court concluded a lease contract with the lessor on May 27, 2010 to the effect that the aforementioned Defendants cannot perform the duty of delivery before receiving the lease deposit. As such, the lower court concluded the lease contract with the lessor K on August 9, 2018, and concluded the lease contract with the term of September 9, 2020 as to the real estate indicated in [Attachment 5] No. 60 million won, and the said lease deposit was paid from the lease period to the term of September 9, 2020; Defendant H concluded the lease contract with the lessor on March 26, 2015, with respect to the real estate No. 50 million won, from the lease period to April 29, 2017 (the above lease contract term was explicitly renewed). Defendant J. 28, 200, and Defendant J. 5, 2008, and Defendant J. 28, 2008.