A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on January 25, 2016, was punished 12 times in total for fraud, including the fact that he/she received a summary order of KRW 2 million in the Sungnam Support, which is a summary order of KRW 12 million in a total amount of fraud.

[Criminal facts] On July 7, 2015, the Defendant called the victim C at a non-permanent place and sent the proceeds to the head of the Tong to sell 2 spop-up tree, 7 spop-up tree and 5 spop-up tree (350,000 won) from the victim C.

different types.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant receives the money from the damaged person as the purchase price of trees, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase the trees to use it as the business expenses of the company.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3,150,00 from the agricultural bank passbook in the name of the Defendant.

The Defendant, on January 25, 2016, is a person with a total of 12 times punishment for fraud, including the fact that he/she received a summary order of KRW 2 million in the Sungnam support, which is a summary order of KRW 12 million in a total amount of fraud.

[2] The Defendant, on July 7, 2015, called the victim F, who operates E in Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, at a place where the police officer was not a patrolman, called the victim F, who operated E in Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, and opened a part of the pine trees planted in G among the pine trees planted in G, as it is necessary to plant trees in the golf course located in Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun.

H The I would pay the price.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the above I, as the result of the processing produced by the defendant, sold the pine trees he developed from the above E to the J who wants to purchase the pine trees to the apartment site located in the Chungcheong Cheongju-si, and there was no intention or ability to pay the pine trees to the victim for the expenses of the defendant's company operation.

On July 26, 2015, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and on July 26, 2015, the market price owned by the victim under the above E.