logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2021.01.13 2020고정350
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) driven a CF small-scale car from a Do adjacent to the Daegu Northern-gu B in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Daegu Jung-gu, while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.056% among blood transfusions on November 3, 2019; (b) the Defendant driven a CF small-scale car from a Do adjacent to the Daegu Northern-gu B.

2. On November 3, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (i.e., measures to be taken after an accident) was driving the said car at around 03:20 on November 3, 2019, and was proceeding by driving the said car at the speed of the viewing screen distance located in the Daegu North-gu Busan Northern Zone at the intersection of the border border along the three-lane width of the road from the opposite intersection to the opposite intersection of the Sungbuk-do.

At the time, the first lane is left and the second lane is right and left, so in such a case, the defendant who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle has the duty of care to operate the intersection after changing the first lane from the second lane to the second lane before entering the intersection by properly operating the steering direction and the operation system in the case that the defendant intends to drive the above private distance intersection from the opposite intersection to the opposite intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went away without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, even though the Defendant’s negligence, which led directly along the two-lanes without changing the lane as seen above, led the victim’s pentle part of the victim’s Do driving, which was going straight into the opposite side of the sexual North Korean school, in accordance with the two-lanes of the road in the border, by taking the front side of the victim’s Do driving, was received as even the right side part of the Defendant’s car, so that the repair cost can be avoided.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's testimony in court at the eight-time public trial date F and G respective legal statements;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident in the police statement protocol made to D and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. The circumstantial statement report (15 pages of evidence records) and the notice of completion of each correction of the inquiry as a result of crackdown on drinking driving (damage taxi) shall be taken by cutting down the screen image of the video.

arrow