A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2017, the Defendant explained that he was not a new G but a pre-contracted taxi while setting up and explaining the reason for 112 police officers’ G belonging to the Seoul Gangnam Police Station F box, which was called Seoul, when he was waiting for a taxi on the front side of Gangnam-gu Seoul, on the ground that a franchise female was born while waiting for a taxi on the front side of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and was working for the taxi.

C. Skhalk Bab Baz

“The breath of “,” and assaulted by hand, such as duplicating G’s breath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness G, H, I, and J's testimony;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement of I;

1. A copy of a letter of arrest and confirmation of flagrant offenders;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [the defendant is not obliged to crack down on the damaged landscape G;

Although G et al. do not meet the requirements for the arrest of a flagrant offender, G et al. put a dub in a dub, while G et al. goes beyond the defendant in the process of arresting the defendant as a flagrant offender and put him/her to a dub, but it does not have a dub, and he/she did not have a dub.

Even if it does not meet the requirements of arrest, it is an act to resist the illegal arrest of a flagrant offender who does not notify the summary of the crime, reasons for detention, and the right to appoint a counsel.

According to the evidence duly examined by this Court, the defendant tried to board a cab which was stopped at the time. However, other passengers who agreed to be a Kakao taxi by a Kakao si are on board, and the defendant prevents the si.