logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.06.26 2019고단2361
철도안전법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2019, the Defendant violated the Railroad Safety Act, around 20:0, the electric car operated in the direction of the reading station of the Incheon subway No. 2, Incheon subway No. 2, and when the Defendant was forced from B (the age of 66) who was the train crew member by avoiding disturbance, such as when the number of female passengers under the influence of alcohol flows back to the reading station of the female passengers under the name of the train, and only when the female son under the name of the female son’s name was checked, the Defendant committed assaulting the above B, which occurred on the job, and then b) the Defendant met with the hand-on her her bbes.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of the safety of passengers of the crew who are railroad workers.

2. For the same reasons as the preceding paragraph of the performance of official duties, the Defendant transferred the face of the above E to the front station office of the Incheon subway 2 line located in 650, Seo-gu, Incheon City, but at around 20:40 on March 8, 2019, at around 20:40, the Defendant received a 112 report from the head of the Incheon Western Police Station C District, who was dispatched to the site, to the effect that the said office “the drinking person spaws down the spaws” around 20:40, while he spawsing the disturbance, such as taking a bath.

On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the E’s back-to-face her back-to-face 1 to move the Defendant to his guardian, on the ground that he was unable to do so.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of official duties in relation to the protective measures of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and B;

1. Relevant statutory provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 78 (1), 49 (2) of the Railroad Safety Act (the violation of the Railroad Safety Act, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act.

arrow