The Defendants are 6% per annum from July 9, 2018 to January 14, 2021 and from the next day to the Plaintiff.

. In the instant commercial building, the retail store was operated with the trade name “K Emt.”

(c)

L on May 21, 2013, with respect to the instant commercial building, the Defendants and the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with a deposit of KRW 80 million, KRW 5,610,000 (including additional taxes), and the period from May 17, 2013 to May 16, 2016, and paid a deposit of KRW 80 million to the Defendants.

L put a retail store with the trade name “K Em” in the instant commercial building.

(d)

The plaintiff paid 190 million won premium and accepted L's whole business.

On June 18, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants as to the instant commercial building (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with a deposit of KRW 80 million, KRW 5,610,000 per month, and the term from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2016, and operated the retail store with the trade name “K Emt” in the instant commercial building.

E. Each lease agreement entered into between L and the Plaintiff is stipulated as follows:

*The lease contract of current facilities and the loss part at the time of use shall be repaired and used by the lessee.

* The lessor cannot require the lessor to complete the premium for the facility and restore the facility to its original state after completion of the lease.

F. The Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to extend the term of the instant lease to October 7, 2016.

On October 7, 2016, the Plaintiff moved out from the instant commercial building, and delivered the key to the instant commercial building to the Defendants.

G. On July 6, 2018, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendants a letter proving the content of demanding the return of deposit, and the said mail reached the Defendants around that time.

[Grounds for recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul Nos. 1, 2, 14, and 16, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease contract was terminated on October 7, 2016 and terminated upon the expiration of the period.

Therefore, unless there are special circumstances, the Defendants are at least KRW 80 million to the Plaintiff.