logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.11.15 2016가단89901
보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 30,250,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 24, 2016 to November 15, 2017; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. On July 2, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the Defendant with respect to the internal team construction works among the new factory construction works (hereinafter “instant construction works”) as follows.

The project owner: The name of the principal contract for the resolution of the conflict of accounts: The name of the subcontractor for the new construction of a factory in Cululty Bioscience B: the contract amount on September 30, 2012: the contract amount on July 20, 2012: 3,494,700,000 won: the warranty period on December 14, 2012 after the completion of the principal contract of this case by the principal contractor: the Plaintiff and the Defendant changed the construction period to October 31, 2012, and reduced the contract amount to KRW 2,664,20,000.

The Plaintiff and the Defendant reserved KRW 101,200,000 out of the construction cost at the time of completion of the said construction in lieu of the warranty bond.

The instant construction defect liability period was terminated on October 31, 2015, and the Defendant offseted the following amount out of KRW 101,200,000 on November 4, 2015, and paid KRW 38,392,617 to the Plaintiff.

(2) On May 27, 2013, the Plaintiff’s administrator respondeded to the Defendant’s consent to the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset (the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset (the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset of the amount of offset, 32,40,000,000, 32,557,383, 30,250,00338,392,617, KRW 392,617, May 27, 2013.

In the lower temperature warehouse below the content of the review, there was a phenomenon above the boundary line of the storage warehouse due to the erroneous construction of the heat, and the occurrence of a malfunction on the part of the construction of the previous construction (e.g., the e., the e., the e.g., the e., the e., the e.g. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e.g. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e.g. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e. the e.

arrow