Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) purchased goods at the D convenience store located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around 23:40 on January 8, 2016; and (b) received a report from 112, and requested that the Defendant disclose the identification card and personal information from G, a police officer belonging to the police officer of the police station in the Jeonjin-gu Special Metropolitan City Police Station, who called out to the scene, to indicate his identity card and personal information; and (c) the Defendant refused to comply with the request from the Assistant Inspector, a police officer belonging to the said police officer assigned to the said Go-gu Special Metropolitan City and the said G.

In order to prevent harm to the employees of the above convenience store, G was pushed down by the police officer's hand on the ground that he/she prevented himself/herself from leaving the above convenience store again at the above convenience store, while "a fighting one-time defect" was turned down in front of the above convenience store.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and the protection of victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is that the defendant's mistake reflects his mistake while attempting to commit the instant crime, and that the degree of assault is significant.

The fact that it is difficult to see that the defendant has made efforts to recover damage by depositing a total of KRW 800,000 for the victimized police officers, etc., and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and theories of this case, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, background, means, methods, results, etc. leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered.