1. The instant lawsuit was concluded on July 8, 2016 as an agreement to withdraw the lawsuit.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the completion of the lawsuit.

The fact that the withdrawal of the instant lawsuit was received by the court on June 11, 2016 in the name of the Plaintiff, stating the purport of the withdrawal of the instant lawsuit, by mail, on June 21, 2016; the fact that the said withdrawal of the lawsuit was served on the Defendant’s legal representative on June 23, 2016; and the fact that the Defendant did not raise any objection for two weeks thereafter is apparent in the record.

Therefore, the instant lawsuit ought to be deemed to have been withdrawn on July 8, 2016.

Plaintiff

On June 29, 2016, the legal representative filed an application to designate the date by asserting that the withdrawal of the above lawsuit was invalid since the Plaintiff was a non-written and non-written name with the knowledge of its contents. We examine the validity of the withdrawal of the lawsuit in this case.

The withdrawal of a lawsuit by the plaintiff is an action against the plaintiff's court to extinguish the continuation of the lawsuit by withdrawing the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff, and the litigation is an action against the plaintiff's court, unlike the action under general private law, it is bound to determine whether the lawsuit has its validity on the basis of its indication rather than the intention in the trial. As long as

(See Supreme Court Decision 97Da6124 Decided June 27, 1997). On the first day for pleading of the court of first instance (date of October 19, 2016), the Plaintiff himself/herself appeared together with the Plaintiff’s legal representative and made a statement to the same effect as the Plaintiff’s legal representative’s assertion. However, on the other hand, he/she made a statement that he/she would be aware of the fact that he/she would have been going to file a lawsuit against the Defendant, who is a female, even though he/she is pending at the appellate court by filing the instant lawsuit against the Defendant, or that he/she would be aware of the fact that he/she would be going to file a lawsuit against his/her female, and on June 29, 2016, the power of attorney of the appellate court was prepared in the same way as at the time when the withdrawal of the said lawsuit was submitted, but with respect to its validity, the Plaintiff’s legal representative was bound by the Plaintiff’s intention.