1. As to the Plaintiff Incorporated Development Co., Ltd.:

A. Defendant B is from November 28, 2013 to KRW 2,000,00 and its amount.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B was the owner of Flue-dong No. 102, Flue-dong No. 102, which was on the ground of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and Defendant C was the owner of Flue-dong No. 103.

B. On December 22, 2010, the owners of 16 households, including the Defendants, (hereinafter “owners”) among the 18 generation units of Flue-Type 18 generation concluded a construction contract on the instant reconstruction project with Geum Chang-do Co., Ltd. on December 22, 2010 in order to remove the Flue-type and build a new main apartment (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”), but upon the termination of the said construction contract, the construction project was conducted upon entering into a construction contract with the Plaintiff Company (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

According to the construction contract of this case, the plaintiff company sold part of the apartment to be newly constructed to the general public and appropriated part of the construction price as the sale price.

C. On March 10, 2012, there was a lot of houses at the residents’ general meeting, and as a result, each apartment building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each apartment of this case”) remains as a general unit sale household. As to each apartment of this case, the Defendants did not cooperate in completing the registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the Plaintiff Company, and the registration of preservation of ownership was completed on May 28, 2013 as a co-ownership of all the building owners, and the shares of the Defendants are 16.33/294, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 30 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Regarding the claim for contributions

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) is primarily responsible for paying to the plaintiff company the amount of KRW 2,00,000 to the owner of the building under the instant construction contract, and the defendant C paid KRW 65,00,000 to the owner of the building under the instant construction contract, respectively, and the amount of KRW 65,00,000 to the plaintiff company.