logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.08.22 2017재나740
청구이의
Text

1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the defendant;

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. Although a court of determination as to the legitimacy of a lawsuit for retrial of this case had been dismissed and confirmed through several times for the same reason, it is obvious that the same request for retrial has not been accepted by law would result in bullying against the other party, and further, it would be unnecessary to spend judicial personnel, barring any special circumstance, such a lawsuit is not allowed (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Da303, Nov. 10, 2005). Thus, the plaintiff's request for retrial (Ulsan District Court Decision 2008Na113, Ulsan District Court 2014Na114, Ulsan District Court 208Na113, Ulsan District Court 208NaNa113, U.S. District Court 2008Da1113, U.S. District Court 201Da320114, U. Ulsan District Court 201Du14215, U.S. High Court Decision 2015Da121414, etc.

Therefore, there is no special circumstance that the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the instant case and should have the right to protection. Thus, the lawsuit in the instant case constitutes an abuse of the right to file a lawsuit, and thus, the lawsuit cannot be allowed.

2. In conclusion, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow