Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C low-est car.

On May 30, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on May 30, 2013, and came to turn to the left the right at the direction of the Simsan-si, Yong-nam-dong-dong-dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeongsan-si, in the direction of the Simsan-si.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to make a left-hand turn in violation of the signal and left-hand turn turn at the same time at a one-lane, and proceeded to the intersection, and received the front part of the car in front of the defendant's driver's car by the victim D(I, 49 years old) who proceeded to the intersection.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim D, such as scarke, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim F (the 41 year old) who is a passenger of the car, thereby causing injury to the victim F (the 6,7 years old), such as “the 6,7 years old pelke,” which requires a medical treatment for about three months, and the 4 weeks of medical treatment on the part of the passenger G (the 42 years old) who is the passenger of the car, suffered injury to the victim G (the 2 years old 42 years old), including “the 2nd pel pelup,” which requires a medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Accident site and vehicle photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act was that the defendant violated the signal and caused the instant accident.