The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant, although he did not tear or forced to remove the shocked net installed on the victim’s small door door door door door door, he was guilty of the facts charged of this case, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the charges of this case. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant can recognize the fact that spits, as stated in the judgment of the court below, are spite into the victim's house windows installed on the small side of the victim's house entrance door after tearing, holding a window by force, and spiting them into the window, and spiting them into the window, booming and spiting them

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed. However, in the judgment of the court below, it is obvious that the “victim” of the crime No. 1 and the “MM C” of the second parallel parallel is each clerical error in the “C” of the “C” of the captain-gun of Busan. Thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1)