A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (CMF) is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with CMF5 vehicle.

On January 31, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 02:10, and led the Defendant to proceed along the three-lanes of the shooting distance in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gun-si, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do along the two-lanes of the shooting distance.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well in the front and rear left and drive the steering gear accurately and to prevent accidents by safely operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the front of the vehicle of the Defendant, which was installed at the center of the road, caused approximately 150 meters of the pedestrian crossing without permission.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing his duties, which caused damage to the repair cost to the extent that the repair cost is equivalent to KRW 15,315,121, did not immediately stop and take necessary measures.

2. On January 31, 2016, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender upon receiving 112 reports from the E convenience store located in Jeollabuk-do, Gun, Jeollabuk-do, on the street, around 02:40 on January 31, 2016, while causing and continuing a traffic accident at the same time and place as above.

At this time, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting approximately 20 minutes in the above place, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the Defendant was drinking while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, sniffing, red, and routing, etc., from the slope G of the Fa of the Military Police Station, and thus, he was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath in

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for sobage measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of an employee will be made;