logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.12.13 2012고단3536
청소년보호법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who operates a D entertainment drinking house in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, had a juvenile drink with a guest for profit, or allowed a juvenile to provide entertainment to a guest by singing or dancing. On October 27, 201 and October 28, 201, the Defendant received 25,000 won per hour from the above entertainment drinking house and received 25,00 won per hour from the juvenile E (the age of 15, the age of 15) to provide entertainment to the male guest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement of each police statement of E;

1. Egram;

1. A copy of each resident registration certificate (No. 1 through 3) / The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that since the defendant received a F resident registration certificate under the name of F from E, confirmed that he/she is not a juvenile, the criminal facts of the judgment cannot be found. According to the records, he/she brought F resident registration certificate in preparation for regulating by E from the owner of the entertainment room business, and the defendant brought a copy of it to the entertainment house of the defendant. However, in light of the legislative purpose of the Juvenile Protection Act, it is recognized that he/she did not have a substantial responsibility to not employ the juvenile to the owner of the business establishment harmful to entertainment, such as entertainment tavern, for the protection of the juvenile, in light of the above legislative purpose of the Juvenile Protection Act, the owner of the entertainment bar business is obliged to verify the age of the person (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Do2425, Jun. 28, 2002).

arrow