logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.25 2017고합182
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매강요등)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

1,100,000 won shall be collected from each of the Defendants.

Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants committed a violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (in the event of coercion, etc. of commercial sex acts), and the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint attack) liveded with the victim E (in the face of 18 years old), and the victim E (in the face of 18 years old) first known of the introduction around December 2016, the Defendants conspired the victim to engage in commercial sex acts and to take compensation therefor, with the knowledge of the fact that the victim first came to know of the victim E (in the face of 18 years old).

Accordingly, on January 7, 2017, at around 22:00, the Defendants set up a FK7 car operated by Defendant A in the vicinity of the instant coffee shop in the city of Kimnam-do, and Defendant A conspired with “G” to engage in commercial sex acts as if Defendant A were to engage in commercial sex acts, and Defendant B discovered the victim who arrived at the site to engage in commercial sex acts, discovered the victim’s head debt at the site, cut off from the vehicle, and laid down the victim’s head debt from the vehicle, and found the victim’s head debt, and caused the victim to fright the victim to go on the back of the vehicle, and fright the victim frighted into the back of the passenger car and frighted the buck on three occasions, and then, the victim frighted the buck at the back of the passenger car, and fright the victim, and frightd the victim, and frightd the victim, hereinafter referred to as “the defect of commercial sex acts”.

After the Defendants continued to have arrived at the above D building 201 by driving their vehicles, Defendant A, who was diving with the victim, had the victim recruit a man who is engaged in commercial sex acts by having the victim engage in commercial sex acts with one telephone, and let the victim engage in commercial sex acts after receiving KRW 150,00 from the male in the name of the non-resident at the non-commercial telephone on January 8, 2017. In this case, the Defendants sent the victim to the above telecom, and then received KRW 150,000 from the victim's sexual sex acts after the completion of commercial sex acts.

As above, the Defendants: (a) from January 8, 2017 to January 10, 2017; (b) from January 15, 2017 to January 04:00 of the same month; and (c) Defendant B sought male engaging in sexual traffic using “G”; and (d) Defendant B sought male engaging in sexual traffic.

arrow