1. All appeals filed by the Defendant B, C, D, F, and independent party intervenors are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be Defendant B, C, D, F.

1. The reasoning of this court’s explanation is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of Paragraph 1, except for partial revision as follows.

Part 3 of the first instance judgment "AF (name AG) is a senior grandchild of AD." The AF (name AG) is amended to "AF (name AG) as an infant of AD and U senior senior grandchild."

The fourth part of the first instance judgment "AO birth" shall be amended to "CC birth".

Part 4 of the first instance judgment "19.12, 1858.12" shall be amended to " October 12, 1858."

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. The reasoning of this court’s reasoning is as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Paragraph 2(a).

B. Decision 1) The Plaintiff’s land in this case was title trusted by the Plaintiff to BE, AM, and AF3 through BR and BS, which are the final cause.

Therefore, the Defendants, who are the successors of title trustee BE, AM, and AF, are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer based on the termination of title trust in proportion to inheritance shares.

B) lack of evidence to deem that Defendant B, C, D, and F were in title trust with BE, AM, and AF around February 1925, and it is unclear whether there existed the Plaintiff’s clan at that time. Even if the land in this case was a title trust land that is not owned by the nominal owner differently from the details indicated in the register, there is also insufficient evidence to regard the Plaintiff as the owner among JC v. W. (2) The evidence presented before determining the claim against Defendant B, C, D, and F, as well as the evidence set forth in the evidence set forth in subparagraphs 10 through 13, and evidence set forth in subparagraphs 10 through 13, 1, 2, and the whole purport of the arguments in the above recognition, and the following facts and circumstances revealed by adding the whole purport of the arguments as to the above recognition.