The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. Although the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that he committed a crime that there was a misjudgment in the course of committing the crime, the sentence of the lower judgment is too unreasonable in light of various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, the background and result of the crime, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, etc., in light of the following: (a) there are many victims of the instant crime; (b) there are many victims of the instant crime; (c) the amount of damage therefrom; and (d) the Defendant acquired considerable profits by disposing of the Nowon-North Korea, etc., which was acquired by the Defendant; and (d

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.