logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.04 2020고단5306
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Around 04:00 on February 17, 2020, the Defendant heard the rumor that the amount of accommodation charges is higher than the amount confirmed by mobile phone display system from the victim C (manam and 39 years of age) who is an employee of the above business establishment, and made a dispute over it, the Defendant threatened the victim by acting in the manner of threatening-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as the victim’s body would inflict bodily harm.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. After filing a prosecution, “a written agreement and a written application for non-compliance with punishment” was submitted.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow