The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition for the defendant, such as the confession and reflect of the crime, the fact that the defendant made an agreement with most victims, and the fact that the considerable amount of money for the thief victim was deposited in the court below. However, the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, and the defendant again committed the crime of this case even during the period of suspension of execution. The court below seems to have determined the punishment by reflecting most favorable circumstances as mentioned above, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, relationship to victims, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all other circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing of this case as indicated in the records, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered to be unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.