The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Criminal facts shall be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). The choice of evidence and probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court.

(Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). Based on its stated reasoning, the court below reversed the judgment of the court of first instance which found the Defendant guilty and acquitted, on the grounds that it is difficult to view that the facts charged were proven to the extent that it excludes reasonable doubts as to the minutes of the board of directors and the

The ground of appeal disputing the fact-finding of the lower court is merely an error of the lower court’s determination on the evidence selection and probative value, which actually belongs to the free judgment of the fact-finding court.

In addition, even if examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the aforementioned legal principles and the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but does not state the grounds for objection to this portion in the petition of appeal and appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.