All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) The content of the text message sent by the Defendant is true, and the Defendant sent the above text message for the public interest, so there is no illegality in Defendant’s act.

2) The sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination on the Defendant’s misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant sent text messages to the Maman-gun G, the chief of general affairs, the urban director, the head of the YO, the head of the YO, the head of the YO, the head of the Dong-gun Eup, the head of the Dong-gun Eup, the head of the YO, the head of the Dong-gun Eup, the head of the Dong-gun area. The contents of the message are as follows: “The reason for the voluntary retirement of the head of the YO (the head of the Eup) before the YO was lost; i.e.,,,, the immediate dismissal of the Plaintiff’s director, abuse, abuse of authority, deviation from discretion, the National Treasury loss, the acts of corruption in the public office, abandonment of duties, and the violation of the State Public Officials Act, etc., and must take corresponding legal measures, such as the right to indemnity.

I have the honor to know in the world where “Iskman-gun D Eup, etc.,” the pattern of pattern, i.e., the pattern of North Korea H, Iskin-gun, Iskin-gun, Iskin.

In a position, other than the Do governor, the head of a Gun's legal right, such as unauthorized exercise of rights, abuse of authority, deviation from discretionary power, violation of the State Public Officials Act, loss of the National Treasury and corruption of public office, etc., is the main station of the 30 billion national government office, which is not worth protecting, such as P. 2.

“,” and “the head of D Eup, the former director, and the representative of the distribution P of medicinal herbs, etc., were unfairly dismissed;

In relation to the temporary general meeting of shareholders on January 12, 201, the judgment of invalidity of the plaintiff's director's dismissal and the judgment of invalidity of the resolution of temporary general meeting of shareholders is proceeding in the Civil Department of Gwangju District Court No. 12.