logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.07.10 2019고단1162
업무방해
Text

[Defendant A] The sentence for Defendant A shall be suspended.

[Defendant B] This case against Defendant B

Reasons

Defendant A, at around 12:00 on March 13, 2019, the crime history room of the crime (Defendant A), Defendant A expressed a large amount of sound on the grounds that the Defendant’s order was not consistent with the simple strings, and that the victim B, who is the business owner, was increased in the restaurant, and took part in the table. Defendant A demanded the victim to take part in the table, and the victim demanded that “hinge, hinge and hinge and hing off the character,” but the victim took part without her sex, and interfered with the victim’s business operation by force for approximately 20 minutes, such as “this weather year, this year, this year, this year, and this year, this year,” and that the statement was collected in the calculation stand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the first offense, and the victim's punishment is not expected to be imposed against the above defendant) of the indictment (the defendant B) dismissed the prosecution (the defendant B), around 12:00 on March 13, 2019, Defendant B used the victim and the victim at the Subdivision C building in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and at the 2nd floor "D cafeteria" as the victim and the Si expenses, and the victim was in a restaurant as the victim and the city expenses, and the victim was in a restaurant in the future, and the victim was in a restaurant in the future, "after she was influencing that she was bruced, she was brued." The victim's two arms were removed, and the victim's hand flucing the victim B's hand on the right side of the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. After the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to want the punishment of Defendant B.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow