logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.01.25 2017노2586
공무집행방해등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The court below's sentence (one year of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, 40 hours of a compliance driving and alcohol treatment lecture, 40 hours of a community service order) against the defendant in summary of the prosecutor's appeal grounds is too unfasible and unfair.

Judgment

The crime of this case is committed by two police officers dispatched by the defendant after receiving a report 112, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties, and failing to comply with the police officer's request for measurement of drinking without any justifiable reason. In light of the contents of the crime, the criminal liability is heavy, and the defendant has the same criminal record as the defendant, and the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant are recognized.

However, it is reasonable to respect the defendant's confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine up to now, and the Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which adopts the principle of court-oriented trials and the principle of direct supervision, where there exists the unique area of the first deliberation as to the determination of sentencing, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first deliberation is not exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The unfavorable circumstances against the defendant, which were recognized above, do not constitute a special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the sentence of the judgment of the court below, and it does not seem unfair because the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unfeasible, considering the overall circumstances surrounding the sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, and environment.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow