1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 23, 2016, the Plaintiff’s husband, who was the Plaintiff’s husband (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered the Ho Ho Ho Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) and worked as the head of a marmist hall at the C Apartment Construction Site (hereinafter “instant site”).

B. On August 5, 2016, at around 10:00, the Deceased complained of, and used for the drums and flapsys, while working together with four workers on the 120 roof (27th height) of the instant site (hereinafter “the instant disaster”), the Deceased was inspected in the emergency room of the D Hospital with the support of its employees, such as brain CT and X-RAY, and there was no special opinion.

After that, the Deceased caused a scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, etc.

The Deceased was diagnosed by acute malute, etc. at the Acheon-ro Hospital, and was treated for this, but died on August 6, 2016.

A person directly in the death diagnosis document for the deceased is indicated as the “multi-growth donation,” the intermediate winner as the “satise shock,” and the pre-satise as the “satise color.”

C. The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents, and claimed the payment of bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses. However, in full view of the fact that, on January 12, 2017, the Defendant does not confirm special burden factors (such as rapid change of work environment, sudden increase of work volume, excessive work volume, stress, etc.) to the extent that it would cause cardio-cerebral diseases prior to the outbreak of work, it is difficult to see that the development hours were excessive, and that it is difficult to see that the working conditions at the time of 10:00 a.m. are likely to cause injury, a proximate causal link between work and injury-disease is recognized.