logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.05.04 2016고단497
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In using and managing access media, no one shall borrow or lend any access medium while demanding, demanding or promising the compensation, or distribute or deliver any access medium, except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts.

On September 21, 2015, the Defendant leased the name unfortunateed person who operated the Internet gambling site in the Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul to KRW 1,00,000 for each month of the first month of the passbook and KRW 1,50,000 for the following month from the next month to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant, cash card connected with the passbook, and the OTP creation.

On September 21, 2015, the Defendant continued to have lost passbooks, etc. from a foreign exchange bank located in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Nowon-gu, and then forwarded again after re-issuance.

In response to the different contact, the head of the above foreign exchange bank account, a re-issuance of the passbook, cash card, and the OTP creation machine, etc., was followed by the re-issuance of the passbook, and the name of the second half of 30 in front of the invoice to receive KRW 1,50,000 per head of the Tong, and the previous bank account in the name of the defendant, together with the passbook, cash card, generation machine, etc. in the name of the defendant.

In addition, on September 22, 2015, the Defendant lost the passbook, etc. from the above person in the foreign exchange bank located in Bupyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and a corporate bank that has near the details of transmission from the above person in the above name, but sent again upon re-issuance.

In response to the request, the head of the Tong, the OTP producer, the cash card, etc. were reissued on the same day, and the name of the 20th first half of the year was replaced on the same day, and the cash card, the OTP producer, and the 20th first half of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigative reports (Attachment of the details of remittance of the amount of damage), inquiry into the details of current and current transactions, and application of the A financial information to the relevant statutes;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow