Text
All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant 1) Each of the Defendant was the victim of the assault and argument, and was the victim of the assault and argument, and there was no assault against the victims as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.
B) The thief Defendant was merely boomed with the consent of the victim or implied consent, and did not commit theft.
2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. It is unfair that the above sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is too uneasible.
2. Determination
A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court as follows, the Defendant’s assaulted the Victim E, F, H, I, G, and M, as indicated in the instant facts charged, can be sufficiently recognized.
Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the defendant's assertion.
(1) The victims' statements are generally consistent and there is no special contradiction in the contents of the statements, and the credibility of the victim's statements is high in line with the statements made by witnesses at the time as follows.
In the police investigation, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that the Defendant made an assault against the victim H, I, and M.
With respect to the violence against the victim E, the statements of the victim E are consistent and credibility in accordance with the statements of the witness.
With respect to the violence against the victim F, the statements of the victim F are reliable because the statements of the victim F are consistent and witnessed.
B. On the part of assault against the victim H, the statements of the victim H are reliable because the statements of the victim H are consistent and witnessed.
At the time of the police investigation, the defendant recognized that he was friendly with H as his grandchild.
㉣ 피해자 I에 대한 폭행의 점에 관하여, 피해자 I의...