Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at around 00:30 on December 17, 2012, when he was investigated by the Defendant as the Defendant-friendly E-mail at the D District D District located in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by publicly insulting the victim G, who is a police officer belonging to the said District, on the ground that the police officer of the said District, was going out of the district boundary, on the ground that the Defendant was investigated by the Defendant, and the Defendant came out of the district boundary, on the ground that the police officers of the said District were going out of the district boundary.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of the above Article, damaged public water by setting up the entrance entrance door of the district zone, which was built as a reinforced glass, on the ground that police officers belonging to the district zone set up the Defendant out of the district zone, caused damage to the public water by destroying the corrective devices of the above entrance amounting to KRW 30,000 at a time.

Summary of Evidence

1, 피고인의 일부 법정진술(지구대 출입문을 발로 한번 찼다는 취지의 진술)

1. A witness G and H’s legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. G statements;

1. CCTV-recording images;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 141(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to public goods), the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides a bath for a police officer in time of trial with the reason for sentencing, and even if the equipment was damaged by the earth entrance entrance, the criminal liability for the defendant is not easy to repent while denying the crime. However, the defendant provided the reason for the defendant's performance of trial expenses with police officers, and the E, who appears to have provided more severe desire than the defendant, provided a summary order of one million won due to insult, was issued and confirmed, and the repair value of the damaged public object was 30,000 won, and the age and age of the defendant.