The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The defendant is the member of the clan, such as the victim C, in the facts charged.

1. At around 14:00 on June 12, 201, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “C removed KRW 200,000 from the actual construction cost while five members, such as G, H, F, and I, were heard, although the victim C embezzled the actual construction cost.”

2. On October 11, 2012, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “C removed KRW 200,000 won of the actual construction cost,” even though the victim C did not embezzled the construction cost of the room, 20 members, such as I, were heard by 20,000 won.”

3. At around 10:30 on March 12, 2013, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by publicly stating that “C removed KRW 200,000 won of the actual construction cost,” although the victim C did not have embezzled the actual construction cost at the L restaurant located in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

4. At around 10:00 on September 30, 2013, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by publicly stating that “C removed KRW 200,000 from the actual construction cost,” although the victim C did not have embezzled the actual construction cost at the L restaurant located in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Republic of Korea: Provided, That the Defendant had no embezzlement of the actual construction cost, the victim’s reputation was damaged.

5. On October 19, 2013, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “C removed KRW 200,000,000 from the actual construction cost, even though the victim C did not embezzled the construction cost of the room, 20,000 won, including I, was heard by the victim C, although the victim C did not have embezzled the construction cost of the room.”