1. The defendant is based on the restoration of the real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 4, and Gap evidence No. 6 (including each number):

① On September 17, 1998, the Plaintiff was awarded a bid of 2,248 square meters and 331 square meters of D miscellaneous land owned by Nonparty C and 4 above D ground buildings owned by Nonparty C. The Plaintiff’s four above D ground buildings, including real estate listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant real estate”), A Dong (97.15 square meters of community facilities on one story and one story) and B Dong (163.80 square meters of community facilities on one story and one story), and Cdong (7.76 square meters of community facilities on one story and one story), and D 2, which were sold to the Defendant for sale and purchase of the above D 1 and 31 square meters of building owned by Nonparty C. According to the purport that the Plaintiff was not entitled to registration of ownership transfer of the instant real estate on the ground that D 1 and C 2, which were used for sale and purchase of the instant real estate on the ground that D 1 and C 2, which were used for registration of ownership transfer.

③ The instant real estate is currently owned by the Defendant.

According to the above facts, the above facts of recognition are examined.