1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 84,704,308 as well as KRW 45,00,000,000 from March 16, 2007.

1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim, Eul Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant C") granted a loan to the defendant Eul Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant Eul"), and the defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the defendant C"), etc. received a claim against the defendants from the non-party bank, and filed a lawsuit against the defendants (hereinafter referred to as "prior action") with the Seoul Central District Court on Oct. 10, 2008, and on Oct. 10, 2008, the above court rendered a judgment that "the defendants jointly and severally agreed with the plaintiff 841,780,669 won and 447,204,289 won with interest of 25% per annum from March 16, 2007 to the day of full payment, and 304,207 won with interest of 205% per annum from 207 to 3084,2007 won.

2. The defendants' assertion and judgment

A. The defendant C asserted that, around February 20, 203, the defendant C would offset the FP loans by selling and selling copyright to the defendant C, and the debt of the defendant C was extinguished. Even if it is not so, the plaintiff's claim (hereinafter "the claim of this case") is extinguished by the extinctive prescription of 5 to 10 years. Thus, the plaintiff's claim cannot be complied with.

Defendant B asserts that the extinctive prescription of the instant claim has expired.

B. 1) Determination 1) Even if a claim established by a judgment on related legal principles falls under the short-term extinctive prescription, the said extinctive prescription shall be ten years (Article 165(1) of the Civil Act); and the prescription interrupted by a judicial claim shall begin to run anew from the time the judgment becomes final and conclusive (Article 178(2) of the Civil Act).