logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.12.13 2013고단824
강제추행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On April 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 04:30, the facts charged in the instant case committed an indecent act by: (b) the victim E (the 19-year-old-old-old-si) who was frighting at the convenience store of “D” operated by the Defendant in E-si, Gyeonggi-do; (c) calculating the victim’s hythm and using the victim’s hythm while taking the hys; and (d) the victim’s hythm and hythd the victim’s hyths by taking the victim’s hythm and hyd the victim

2. The instant facts charged constitute Article 298 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012; and enforced as of Jun. 19, 2013) and thus, a public prosecution can be instituted only when a victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 306 of the same Act. According to the records, the victim submitted a written agreement that contains the meaning of revocation of the complaint against the Defendant around November 2013, which is the date of the instant public prosecution. Thus, the instant public prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow