logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.04.03 2018고단209
모욕
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant is a person who was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on March 17, 2017 and is still under suspended execution after the judgment became final and conclusive on March 17, 2017.

[2] On November 1, 2017, the Defendant, at around 23:50 on the road of the “H week” located in G when lighting, and received a report from the victim J, a police officer belonging to the I District Police Station, who was dispatched to the site and received a request for returning home from the victim J, who was the police officer belonging to the I District Police Station of the G District, and the victim, who was in the past, expressed to the majority of unspecified people who had been in the past, that the horses were unfashed, unfashed, fash, fash, and fashed,” thereby openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Investigation report ( telephone conversations between a wooden person and K);

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes during the period of suspension of execution;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the circumstances leading up to the instant crime and the criminal records of the Defendant, etc., it is necessary to correct the perception of the Defendant through strict punishment in order to prevent the repetition of similar acts, since the Defendant’s tendency to disregard the law is strong because he/she failed to refrain from drinking.

I also seem to be.

However, in consideration of the fact that the defendant is receiving a mental treatment and paying a gold, the punishment shall be determined as set forth in the Disposition.

arrow