beta
Text
The judgment below
The guilty part against Defendant A (including the innocent part) and the guilty part against Defendant B;
Reasons
I. Scope of the adjudication of this Court
1. 2-B. The lower court found the Defendant A, G, H, S, T, and U as to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud and Breach of Trust) on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud and Breach of Trust), Defendant A, H, T, and U as jointly Defendant E and F in collusion with the lower court, thereby deceiving the victim, thereby causing a total of KRW 1,401,00,000,000, and at the same time, Defendant H and S violated their occupational duties and thereby causing a loss equivalent to the above amount to the victim, and found the Defendant H and S guilty on the ground that there was no proof of a crime regarding the part exceeding the above amount of damage in relation to the crime.
As to this part of the appeal, the above Defendants and the Prosecutor appealed, but the Prosecutor did not appeal as to the part of the judgment of innocence.
Therefore, the above part of the judgment of innocence was transferred to the appellate court, but it had already been exempted from the object of attack and defense between the parties, and thus, this part is not subject to the conclusion of the judgment of the lower court and the conclusion of the judgment of the lower court.
2. The lower court found Defendant Q Q, R’s offering of a bribe, Defendant P’s offering of a bribe, Defendant P’s offering of a bribe on September 16, 2015, and December 17, 2015; Defendant Q and R’s offering of a bribe; Defendant Q and R’s offering of a bribe on September 16, 2015; Defendant Q and R’s offering of a bribe at each drinking level of at least KRW 1,800,000 of the drinking price on December 17, 2015; Defendant Q and R received a bribe; Defendant Q and R offered a bribe on September 16, 2015; and Defendant Q and R did not prove that there was no proof of a limited relation with each of the above crimes with respect to a bribe exceeding KRW 620,600,000,000 for entertainment on December 17, 2015.
As to this, the above Defendants and the public prosecutor appealed against this part, but the public prosecutor found the above not guilty.