1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The defendant, such as the plaintiff's disciplinary power, is a legal entity that employs 4,600 full-time workers and engages in the manufacture and sales of automobile fishing, and the plaintiff was employed as a production worker on December 23, 1993 by being employed by the defendant as a production worker.

The defendant has undermined the defendant's honor by inserting false facts on the part of "C," which is his own personal website (hereinafter "individual website"), and the same year from February 25, 2005, on the ground that the plaintiff damaged the defendant's reputation by inserting false facts on the part of "A," which is his own personal website (hereinafter "individual website").

7.9. With respect to the publishing activity from September 6, 2006 to December 8 of the same year, the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against 'the publishing activity' from September 6, 2006 to two-lanes.

On the other hand, on May 20, 2006, the Defendant issued a two-month disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the grounds of the above first accusation part, etc. On September 21, 2007, the Seoul Administrative Court notified the Defendant of the decision of suspension from office before the enforcement of suspension from office, and notified the Defendant of the decision before the suspension from office, and held a Civil Service Commission that falls under the review procedure for suspension from office after the suspension period has expired, which declared that the retrial procedure was not implemented at all or that there was a serious defect in the review procedure, and that the decision became final and conclusive around that time.

In addition, on January 5, 2007, on the grounds of the above second accusation part, the Defendant issued a 45-day disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the grounds of suspension from office. On May 4, 2007, the Labor Relations Commission rendered a judgment that the above disciplinary measure was detrimental to the honor of the Defendant, or that it was difficult to deem that the above disciplinary measure was instigates its employees, or that it was unfair for the reason that it was difficult to deem the above disciplinary measure to have instigated its employees

The actual tax amount shall be the criminal facts of the first accusation case (2005 piece 28555,2006No700,206Do8044).

1. Despite the fact that a company did not intervene in the election of a representative of a trade union in February 25, 2005, the company is not a member at the time of an election of a representative of a trade union, but also a member on its personal website.