1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From April 28, 2016, the above buildings.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the fact that there is no dispute between the parties), the plaintiff set lease deposit amount to the defendant as KRW 50,00,00, monthly rent of KRW 350,000, and the fact that the plaintiff delivered the building of this case to the defendant on April 27, 2015 and renewed the lease contract on April 27, 2015 to April 27, 2017 (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"), for the reasons that the contract of this case was unpaid as KRW 3,850,00,00, KRW 60, KRW 80, KRW 160, KRW 80, KRW 106, KRW 80, KRW 106, KRW 80, KRW 400, KRW 500, KRW 106, KRW 205, KRW 80, KRW 168,016, KRW 2016.

Therefore, the defendant delivers the building of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendant bears the duty to pay 3,850,000 won in arrears and value-added tax on July 2014; 2,065,810 won in each of the management expenses on July 2016 and August 2016; 2,065,810 won in total; 2,605,161 won in arrears; 284,000 won in arrears of management expenses on August 2014; 50,000 won in arrears of management expenses on January 2015; 298,000 won in total, and 298,000 won in arrears of management expenses on April 2016; 1,082,537,161 won in total (3,850,000 won in arrears, 605,101, 208, 2008, 308.6.

2. The Defendant’s argument regarding the Defendant’s assertion is divided into July 2016, August 2016, and September 2016.