1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed.

B. The Defendant’s December 2012

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 4, 2008, the Plaintiff entered the Army as a sergeant and discharged from active service on January 24, 2010.

B. The Plaintiff asserted that during military service, he/she exceeded his/her utmost while transporting cement and installing communications antennas at a military unit to which he/she belongs. On July 18, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant wounds”).

C. On December 6, 2012, the Defendant issued a disposition to grant a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation to the Plaintiff in accordance with the resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement that “The symptoms of this case are not temporary or natural therapy, and there is a medical opinion that it does not remain obstacles to daily life in the state where the nuclear power is so early, and the symptoms do not constitute an injury to the requirements of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State, and the filing of the application is not deemed to have been caused or aggravated under proximate causal relation with the performance of military duties,” in accordance with the resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 4 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted that he was wounded in the instant case while performing cement transport work around June 2008 after entering the military, and around December 2009, while installing a telecommunication antenna during telecommunication training. This is a soldier or policeman wounded in the course of performing his duty or education and training directly related to the national defense and security or the protection of the lives and property of the people. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion constitutes a soldier or policeman serving in the State as a soldier or policeman, and even if not, falls under the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation.

Therefore, I would like to revoke the disposition of non-person who rendered distinguished service to the State, and seek revocation of the disposition of non-person eligible for veteran's compensation.

3. The attachment to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as specified;

4...