The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

On the grounds stated in its reasoning, the court below affirmed the first instance judgment that acquitted witness D of the primary facts charged in this case on the ground that the witness D did not meet the requirements for admissibility of evidence under Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and found the defendant not guilty of the primary facts charged in addition to the original judgment on the ground that the defendant'

Examining the records in light of the relevant legal principles, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by misunderstanding facts in violation of logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal principles on legitimate acts under Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 314.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.